Files
Conflict_Checker/backend/.llm_cache/eeaee351768a4fc7d395283a98e04fb00a4199db99c26e848d26e47d65fd351e.json
woogiandClaude Opus 4.8 1d248a8808 Initial commit: Conflict Checker
Cross-discipline design-contradiction checker for construction drawing
sets. Standalone tool broken out from Iron_Bid; a pipeline stage may
later fold back into Iron_Bid.

Pipeline: PDF->images -> per-sheet assertion extraction -> deterministic
clustering by location -> per-cluster reasoning -> report.
Includes CLI (cli/run_check.py) and web UI (backend/main.py).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-03 00:22:02 +00:00

1 line
1.2 KiB
JSON

{"conflicts": [{"conflict_id": "sales-area-lighting-layout", "category": "location_mismatch", "severity": "high", "confidence": "high", "location": "SALES AREA Ceiling", "disciplines": ["Architectural", "Electrical"], "sheets": ["E03.01"], "description": "The electrical lighting plan on sheet E03.01 shows a specific layout for light fixtures, while an architectural reflected ceiling plan inset on the same sheet shows a completely different, denser grid layout. A handwritten note on the drawing explicitly calls out this discrepancy, stating 'fixture locations not matching arch'. This must be resolved to avoid building the wrong lighting scheme in the primary retail space, which would result in significant rework.", "evidence": [{"discipline": "Electrical", "sheet": "E03.01", "source_text": "fixture locations not matching arch", "asserted_value": "The main electrical lighting plan shows a linear arrangement of fixtures."}, {"discipline": "Architectural", "sheet": "E03.01", "source_text": "[Inset image of architectural reflected ceiling plan]", "asserted_value": "The architectural plan inset shows a dense grid of light fixtures."}], "recommended_resolution": "coordinate drawings"}]}