woogiandClaude Opus 4.8
1d248a8808
Cross-discipline design-contradiction checker for construction drawing sets. Standalone tool broken out from Iron_Bid; a pipeline stage may later fold back into Iron_Bid. Pipeline: PDF->images -> per-sheet assertion extraction -> deterministic clustering by location -> per-cluster reasoning -> report. Includes CLI (cli/run_check.py) and web UI (backend/main.py). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 line
26 KiB
JSON
1 line
26 KiB
JSON
{"rfi_comments": [{"rfi_id": "RFI-001", "issue_id": "juris-01", "title": "Project Jurisdiction Conflict", "question": "Please clarify the correct project jurisdiction (Harris County, TX vs. San Diego, CA) and confirm the applicable building codes, accessibility standards, and review paths. This is critical for a valid code review.", "background": "The project's code profile lists the jurisdiction as San Diego, CA, with Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS) review disabled. However, sheet G21.01 explicitly states the Authority Having Jurisdiction is Harris County, TX, and the applicable accessibility standard is the 2012 Texas Accessibility Standards. This discrepancy creates a conflict between California and Texas codes, making a correct code review impossible.", "sheets_referenced": ["G21.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["General", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Confirm the correct project jurisdiction and update the code profile accordingly.", "priority": "high"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-002", "issue_id": "JURISDICTION-CONFLICT-001", "title": "Project Location and Jurisdiction Discrepancy", "question": "Please confirm the correct project jurisdiction (City of San Diego, CA or Cypress, TX) and revise all code references, accessibility standards, and address information throughout the drawing set accordingly.", "background": "The code profile indicates the project is in San Diego, CA, while sheet A11.01 states the address is in Cypress, TX. This discrepancy affects all applicable building, fire, and accessibility codes (e.g., California Building Code vs. IBC/Texas state amendments, California accessibility standards vs. Texas Accessibility Standards/ADA).", "sheets_referenced": ["G11.01", "A11.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["General", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "The Architect of Record must confirm the correct project jurisdiction and revise all code references and address information accordingly.", "priority": "high"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-003", "issue_id": "pendant_headroom_clearance", "title": "Pendant Light Fixture Headroom Clearance", "question": "Verify the location of pendant fixtures L-5 and L-6. If they are located above circulation paths, revise the mounting height to provide at least 80 inches of clear headroom to the lowest point of the fixture. Alternatively, relocate the fixtures to be directly over furniture or other elements not part of a circulation path.", "background": "Pendant light fixtures L-5 and L-6 are specified to be mounted at 5'-5\" (65 inches) above the finished floor. These fixtures appear to be located in the open 'Sales Area' on the lighting plan. The standard required head clearance for accessible circulation paths is 80 inches minimum. A 65-inch mounting height creates a significant overhead obstruction and collision hazard.", "sheets_referenced": ["E01.02", "E03.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Electrical", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Confirm the location of the fixtures and adjust mounting height or relocation as needed.", "priority": "high"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-004", "issue_id": "VZE-CA-SD-002", "title": "Vent Through Roof (VTR) Proximity to Outdoor Air Intake", "question": "Relocate the 10\" VTR and/or the RTU-1 outdoor air intake to ensure they are separated by a minimum of 10 feet, as required by the International Mechanical Code (typically Section 501.3.1 or similar).", "background": "The Mechanical Roof Plan shows a 10\" vent through roof (VTR), likely a plumbing vent, located within the 10-foot minimum separation radius required from the outdoor air intake (economizer hood) of RTU-1. This proximity can introduce noxious fumes or sewer gas into the building's ventilation system.", "sheets_referenced": ["M02.02"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Mechanical", "Plumbing"], "suggested_response_needed": "Relocate the VTR or RTU-1 outdoor air intake to meet the 10-foot separation requirement.", "priority": "high"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-005", "issue_id": "verizon_elyson_wc_stall_depth_coordination", "title": "Toilet Compartment Depth for Floor-Mounted Water Closet", "question": "Verify that the architectural plans show that the wheelchair accessible compartments provide a minimum clear interior depth of 59 inches to accommodate the specified floor-mounted water closet. If this dimension is not met, either revise the architectural plans or change the plumbing fixture to a wall-hung model and confirm the stall depth is at least 56 inches.", "background": "Plumbing fixture WC-1 is specified as a 'FLOOR MOUNTED' model. According to ADA 604.8.1.1, wheelchair accessible compartments with floor-mounted water closets require a minimum depth of 59 inches. This is 3 inches deeper than the requirement for a wall-hung model (56 inches).", "sheets_referenced": ["P01.01", "G21.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Plumbing", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Confirm the compartment depth in architectural plans or adjust the plumbing fixture type.", "priority": "high"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-006", "issue_id": "VZE-CA-SD-003", "title": "HVAC Condensate Drainage Connection to Sanitary Sewer", "question": "Clarify and detail the method of connecting the condensate drain to the sanitary sewer. Ensure the connection is indirect and compliant with the applicable plumbing code, typically by draining to a floor sink or other approved receptor with a visible air gap.", "background": "A note on the mechanical details states that the condensate drain will terminate in the sanitary sewer. Direct connection of HVAC condensate to a sanitary sewer is prohibited by plumbing codes as it can allow sewer gas to enter the building's air supply. An indirect connection via an air gap or air break is required.", "sheets_referenced": ["M03.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Mechanical", "Plumbing"], "suggested_response_needed": "Provide details for an indirect connection to the sanitary sewer.", "priority": "high"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-007", "issue_id": "ISSUE-001", "title": "Lighting Plan vs. Reflected Ceiling Plan Discrepancy", "question": "Please coordinate the electrical lighting plan (E03.01) with the architectural reflected ceiling plan (inset on E03.01) to resolve the discrepancy in fixture layout. This must be resolved before construction to avoid significant rework of the ceiling and wiring.", "background": "The electrical lighting plan for the Sales Area on sheet E03.01 shows a different layout of light fixtures than the architectural reflected ceiling plan, which is shown as an inset on the same drawing. The electrical engineer's plan shows long continuous rows of fixtures, while the architectural plan shows fixtures arranged in groups to align with the furniture layout shown on A24.01.", "sheets_referenced": ["E03.01", "A24.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Architectural", "Electrical"], "suggested_response_needed": "Coordinate the lighting plan with the reflected ceiling plan.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-008", "issue_id": "ISSUE-002", "title": "Conflicting IBC Editions in Drawing Set", "question": "Please confirm the correct edition of the International Building Code (IBC) to be used for the project (2018 vs. 2021) and ensure all drawings are consistent with the selected edition.", "background": "The Code/Exiting Plan on G21.01 specifies the 2018 IBC, while the Architectural Finish Plan (A23.01) and Electrical Notes (E01.01) both reference the 2021 IBC. The entire project must be designed to a single, consistent code edition for permitting and construction.", "sheets_referenced": ["G21.01", "A23.01", "E01.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["General", "Architectural", "Electrical"], "suggested_response_needed": "Confirm the correct IBC edition and update all drawings accordingly.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-009", "issue_id": "ISSUE-003", "title": "Exhaust Fan Clearance Conflict", "question": "Please resolve the conflict between the 10-foot radius clearance requirement for the exhaust fans and their current 6'-9\" separation as shown on the Architectural Roof Plan. Ensure the fans are located at least 10 feet apart to meet the required clearance.", "background": "The Mechanical Roof Plan indicates a 10-foot radius clearance requirement associated with the new exhaust fans (Keynote 3). However, the fans are shown located only 6'-9\" apart per the Architectural Roof Plan, causing their required clearance zones to overlap.", "sheets_referenced": ["M02.02", "A25.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Mechanical", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Adjust the fan locations to meet the 10-foot separation requirement.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-010", "issue_id": "ISSUE-004", "title": "Knee Clearance Inconsistency Between General and Specific Details", "question": "Please reconcile the discrepancy between the general typical details on sheet G11.02 (28\" minimum knee clearance) and the specific restroom elevation on sheet A51.01 (29\" minimum knee clearance). Ensure all drawings are consistent with the correct minimum knee clearance requirement.", "background": "The general typical details on sheet G11.02 show a minimum knee clearance height of 28 inches for an accessible lavatory, while the specific restroom elevation on sheet A51.01 shows a minimum knee clearance height of 29 inches. While the 29\" dimension meets the 28\" requirement, the inconsistency between the general standard and the specific detail can cause confusion for fabrication and installation.", "sheets_referenced": ["G11.02", "A51.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["General", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Coordinate the knee clearance dimensions across all relevant drawings.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-011", "issue_id": "ISSUE-005", "title": "Vent Pipe Size Discrepancy Between Sanitary Waste & Vent Plan and Typical Piping Riser Diagram", "question": "Please confirm the correct size of the vent pipe for the main vent branch serving the fixtures (2 inches vs. 1 1/2 inches) and coordinate the drawings to ensure consistency in material procurement and installation.", "background": "The vent pipe size is shown as 2 inches on the Sanitary Waste & Vent Plan (P02.01) for the main vent branch serving the fixtures, but is shown as 1 1/2 inches on the typical piping riser diagram (P03.01). The correct size needs to be confirmed and drawings coordinated for proper material procurement and installation.", "sheets_referenced": ["P02.01", "P03.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Plumbing"], "suggested_response_needed": "Confirm the correct vent pipe size and coordinate the drawings.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-012", "issue_id": "ISSUE-006", "title": "Missing Electrical Panels in Architectural Plans", "question": "Please update the architectural plans to show the electrical panels 'H' and 'L' located on the west wall of the Lounge, as indicated on the electrical one-line diagram and power plan. This is necessary for coordinating wall construction, finishes, and required clearances.", "background": "The electrical one-line diagram and power plan show electrical panels 'H' and 'L' located on the west wall of the Lounge. The architectural plans do not show these panels, which is necessary for coordinating wall construction, finishes, and required clearances.", "sheets_referenced": ["E01.02", "E02.01", "A23.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Electrical", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Update the architectural plans to include the electrical panels 'H' and 'L'.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-013", "issue_id": "ISSUE-007", "title": "Missing Floor Drain in Architectural Finish Plan", "question": "Please update the architectural finish plan A23.01 to include the floor drain indicated in the plumbing plan P02.01 for the Cleaning Supplies/Storage room. This is necessary for coordinating slab depression, waterproofing details, and floor slope requirements.", "background": "The plumbing plan P02.01 indicates a floor drain (FD) in the Cleaning Supplies/Storage room. This floor drain is not shown on the architectural finish plan A23.01. The architectural plan must be updated to include the floor drain, as its absence impacts slab depression, waterproofing details, and floor slope requirements.", "sheets_referenced": ["P02.01", "A23.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Plumbing", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Update the architectural finish plan to include the floor drain.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-014", "issue_id": "ADA-CARPET-PILE-HEIGHT-001", "title": "Carpet Pile Height for Accessibility Compliance", "question": "Verify that the specified carpet tile product (Shaw NEXT GEN 2.0) has a pile height of 1/2 inch or less. Add the pile height information to the finish schedule or specifications to confirm compliance with ADA 302.2.", "background": "The finish schedule specifies carpet tile CPT1 in accessible areas (Sales Area, Manager's Office) but does not specify the pile height. To comply with accessibility standards, carpet pile height must be 1/2 inch maximum to ensure navigability for people using mobility devices.", "sheets_referenced": ["A23.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Confirm the pile height of the specified carpet tile and update the finish schedule.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-015", "issue_id": "ISSUE-008", "title": "Missing Thermostatic Mixing Valve in Architectural Elevations", "question": "Please update the architectural elevations detailing the under-sink conditions (Details 2, 3, and 6) to show the thermostatic mixing valve (TMV) required for lavatory L-1. This is necessary for coordinating space, clearances, and insulated wrap requirements, particularly for ADA compliance.", "background": "The plumbing fixture schedule for lavatory L-1 explicitly requires a thermostatic mixing valve (TMV). However, the architectural elevations detailing the under-sink conditions (Details 2, 3, and 6) do not show this valve. Instead, they depict hot and cold supply lines connecting directly to the faucet.", "sheets_referenced": ["P01.01", "A51.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Plumbing", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Update the architectural elevations to include the thermostatic mixing valve.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-016", "issue_id": "CODE-SLIP-RESISTANCE-001", "title": "Slip Resistance Specification for Polished Concrete Floor", "question": "Please revise the specification for polished concrete (PC1) to require a wet Dynamic Coefficient of Friction (DCOF) of 0.42 or greater when tested per ANSI A326.3. Provide product data or test reports demonstrating compliance.", "background": "The specification for polished concrete floor (PC1) requires a Static Coefficient of Friction (SCOF) of 0.50. SCOF is an obsolete test method for slip resistance. The current building codes and industry standards reference ANSI A326.3, which requires a Dynamic Coefficient of Friction (DCOF) of 0.42 or greater for level interior spaces expected to be walked upon when wet, such as restrooms.", "sheets_referenced": ["A23.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Revise the slip resistance specification to use DCOF and provide compliance documentation.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-017", "issue_id": "ISSUE-009", "title": "Missing Thermostatic Mixing Valve in Plumbing Floor Plan", "question": "Please update the plumbing floor plan P02.01 to show the thermostatic mixing valve (TMV) required for the electric drinking fountain (EDF-1). This is necessary for coordinating physical space within the wall and potential access panel requirements.", "background": "The plumbing riser diagram on sheet P03.01 indicates that a thermostatic mixing valve (TMV) is required to supply tempered water to the electric drinking fountain (EDF-1). However, this TMV is not located on the plumbing floor plan on P02.01. The valve requires physical space within the wall and potentially an access panel, which is not accounted for and must be coordinated with architecture.", "sheets_referenced": ["P03.01", "P02.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Plumbing", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Update the plumbing floor plan to include the thermostatic mixing valve.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-018", "issue_id": "VZE-CA-SD-001", "title": "Toe Clearance for Accessible Lavatory", "question": "Please verify the dimensioning of the toe clearance at the accessible lavatories. The detail should be revised to provide a minimum clear height of 9 inches for toe space, extending for the required depth per ADA standards, to ensure proper forward approach for a wheelchair user.", "background": "The sink detail specifies a '6\" MAX. TOE CLEAR', which appears to indicate the height of the toe kick space under the lavatory cabinet. ADA Standards generally require a minimum height of 9 inches for toe clearance to allow for a wheelchair user's footrests to pass underneath. A 6-inch high space would not be sufficient.", "sheets_referenced": ["A51.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Architectural", "Plumbing"], "suggested_response_needed": "Revise the toe clearance detail to meet ADA 606.2 requirements.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-019", "issue_id": "ISSUE-010", "title": "Conflicting National Electrical Code (NEC) Editions", "question": "Please confirm the correct edition of the National Electrical Code (NEC) to be used for the project (2014 vs. 2023) and ensure all drawings are consistent with the selected edition.", "background": "There is an inconsistency in the referenced version of the National Electrical Code (NEC). The Code/Exiting plan on G21.01 has a confusing note citing '2023 STATE OF TEXAS ADOPTED 2014 NFPA 70...', while the Electrical Notes on E01.01 clearly state '2023 NEC'. The correct and consistent code version needs to be established across the drawing set.", "sheets_referenced": ["G21.01", "E01.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["General", "Electrical"], "suggested_response_needed": "Confirm the correct NEC edition and update all drawings accordingly.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-020", "issue_id": "data_outlet_height", "title": "Data Outlet Height for Accessibility Compliance", "question": "Please relocate the data outlet to a maximum height of 48 inches above the finished floor to comply with accessible reach range requirements. If the outlet is intended for dedicated equipment (e.g., a wall-mounted display) and not general use, provide documentation to justify the 'dedicated use' exception.", "background": "A CAT.6 data outlet in the 'Sales Area' is specified to be mounted at 55 inches above the finished floor. This height exceeds the 48-inch maximum for unobstructed reach range for operable parts, making it inaccessible to individuals using a wheelchair. While there is an exception for dedicated use receptacles, it is not clear that this outlet qualifies.", "sheets_referenced": ["E04.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Electrical", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Adjust the data outlet height or provide justification for the dedicated use exception.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-021", "issue_id": "ISSUE-011", "title": "Vapor Barrier Requirement Discrepancy", "question": "Please confirm the correct vapor barrier requirement for floor slab infills (15 mil vs. 6 mil) and ensure all relevant drawings are consistent with the more stringent Landlord requirement.", "background": "The Landlord Work Letter on sheet G11.03 requires a 15 mil vapor barrier for floor slab infills, while a note on a plumbing detail on sheet P03.01 specifies a minimum of 6 mil, citing the IBC. While the 15 mil requirement meets the minimum 6 mil code requirement, the discrepancy in the contract documents creates ambiguity for the bidding contractor. The more stringent Landlord requirement must be consistently applied across all relevant drawings.", "sheets_referenced": ["G11.03", "P03.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["General", "Plumbing"], "suggested_response_needed": "Coordinate the vapor barrier requirements across all relevant drawings.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-022", "issue_id": "ISSUE-012", "title": "Project Scope Description Inconsistency", "question": "Please clarify whether the project is a 'build out for a first generation retail space' or a 'tenant interior remodel' and revise all relevant drawings accordingly.", "background": "The project scope is described inconsistently across two different sheets. Sheet G11.04 states the project is a 'build out for a first generation retail space,' which implies working in a new, empty shell building. However, sheet G21.01 describes the project as a 'tenant interior remodel,' which implies demolition and alteration of a previously finished space. This must be clarified as it significantly impacts the scope of work, demolition requirements, and bidding.", "sheets_referenced": ["G11.04", "G21.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["General", "General"], "suggested_response_needed": "Clarify the project scope and revise all relevant drawings accordingly.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-023", "issue_id": "ISSUE-013", "title": "Duplicate Fixture Tag for Rooftop Units", "question": "Please assign unique tags to the two distinct new rooftop units on the Mechanical Roof Plan (M02.02) to avoid ambiguity for contractors, installers, and commissioning agents. Each piece of equipment requires a unique identifier for clear reference.", "background": "The Mechanical Roof Plan on M02.02 shows two distinct new rooftop units, but both are identically tagged as 'RTU-1'. The Rooftop Unit Schedule on M01.01 defines the specifications for a unit type 'RTU-1'. While the units may be identical models, assigning the same tag to two separate physical objects creates ambiguity for contractors, installers, and commissioning agents.", "sheets_referenced": ["M02.02", "M01.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Mechanical"], "suggested_response_needed": "Assign unique tags to the rooftop units.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-024", "issue_id": "ISSUE-014", "title": "Duplicate Fixture Tag for Floor Drains", "question": "Please revise the fixture tag 'FD-1' for one of the floor drains to avoid ambiguity in fixture schedules, procurement, and installation. One tag should be revised, for example, to 'FD-2'.", "background": "The fixture tag 'FD-1' is used for two separate floor drains, one located in the Men's Restroom and another in the Women's Restroom. Fixture tags must be unique to avoid ambiguity in fixture schedules, procurement, and installation.", "sheets_referenced": ["P02.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Plumbing"], "suggested_response_needed": "Revise the duplicate fixture tag to ensure uniqueness.", "priority": "medium"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-025", "issue_id": "ISSUE-015", "title": "Potential Access Conflict Between Data Outlets and Shelving", "question": "Please clarify the height and configuration of the shelving on the west wall of the storage room (A24.01) to ensure it does not conflict with the data outlets shown on sheet E04.01 at 18 inches AFF.", "background": "Data outlets shown on sheet E04.01 at 18 inches AFF on the west wall of the storage room are in the same location as 'SHELVING, U.N.O.' on the architectural furniture plan A24.01. The undefined height and configuration of the shelving creates a potential access conflict with the data outlets.", "sheets_referenced": ["E04.01", "A24.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Electrical", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Clarify shelving height and configuration to avoid access conflict.", "priority": "low"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-026", "issue_id": "ISSUE-016", "title": "Transformer Installation Conflict with Exposed Ceiling", "question": "Please clarify the installation requirements for the transformer in the Lounge, as the architectural finish plan indicates the ceiling is 'Exposed to Deck', meaning there is no accessible ceiling below the structure. The electrical keynote states the transformer should be suspended 'above accessible ceiling', which may not be feasible.", "background": "Electrical keynote 7 for the transformer in the Lounge states it is to be suspended 'above accessible ceiling'. However, the architectural finish plan indicates the ceiling in the Lounge is 'Exposed to Deck', meaning there is no accessible ceiling below the structure.", "sheets_referenced": ["E02.01", "A23.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Electrical", "Architectural"], "suggested_response_needed": "Clarify transformer installation requirements based on actual ceiling conditions.", "priority": "low"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-027", "issue_id": "ISSUE-017", "title": "Inconsistent Room Labeling for Women's Restroom", "question": "Please update all drawings to use a single, consistent name for the women's restroom, preferably 'WOMEN'S RESTROOM 102', to avoid confusion during documentation, submittals, and RFIs.", "background": "The women's restroom is labeled inconsistently across the drawing set. It is identified as 'WOMEN'S RESTROOM', 'WOMEN'S / RESTROOM', a generic 'RESTROOM', and 'WOMEN'S ROOM' on various plans. While the intent is clear, this inconsistency can lead to confusion during documentation, submittals, and RFIs.", "sheets_referenced": ["G21.01", "A51.01", "E03.01", "P02.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["General", "Architectural", "Electrical", "Plumbing"], "suggested_response_needed": "Update all drawings with a consistent room name.", "priority": "low"}, {"rfi_id": "RFI-028", "issue_id": "ISSUE-018", "title": "Incorrect ASTM Standard Reference for Fire Rating", "question": "Please correct the reference to 'ASTM 834' in the Architectural Finish Plan (A23.01) to 'ASTM E-84' to match the correct standard referenced in the Electrical sheet (E01.01). 'ASTM 834' appears to be a typo and must be corrected.", "background": "Architectural and Electrical sheets reference different ASTM standards for the same purpose of material fire rating. The Architectural Finish Plan incorrectly cites 'ASTM 834' for finish classification, while the Electrical sheet correctly references 'ASTM E-84' for flame and smoke ratings. ASTM E-84 is the correct standard; 'ASTM 834' appears to be a typo that must be corrected.", "sheets_referenced": ["A23.01", "E01.01"], "disciplines_to_respond": ["Architectural", "Electrical"], "suggested_response_needed": "Correct the ASTM standard reference in the Architectural Finish Plan.", "priority": "low"}]} |