πŸ” CONFLICT CHECKER

How your construction plans get reviewed β€” a team of AI assistants, each with one job, passing notes down the line.
1
πŸ“„

The Scanner

Turns every page of your PDF blueprints into a picture the AI can read.

β†’
2
πŸ‘“

The Readers

One assistant per page, all working at once. Each writes down every fact: dimensions, notes, materials, callouts.

β†’
3
πŸ“š

Librarian & Code Scout

Builds the table of contents (electrical, plumbing, structural…) and figures out where the project is, so the right building codes apply.

β†’
↓
5
πŸ•΅οΈ

The Detectives

One per topic pile. Hunts for contradictions between sheets that should agree β€” and mistakes within a single sheet: "wall shown here, but not on the structural plan."

β†’
6
πŸ“

The Specialists

Working at once: a drawing proofreader (dangling callouts, a schedule vs its own plan, dimensions that don't add up), a veteran builder ("can this be built?"), and a checklist keeper ("is anything missing?").

β†’
7
🧠

The Brain

The senior reviewer. Merges duplicates, discards weak findings, ranks the rest β€” then sends the ones it doubts back for a zoomed-in second look and drops any that don't hold up.

β†’
8
βœ…

Human Review

The important and uncertain findings land on your desk. You confirm, reject, or mark unsure β€” nothing goes out unapproved.

↓
πŸ“‹ Final Report + βœ‰οΈ Draft RFIs
A prioritized list of every problem found β€” plus ready-to-send "please clarify" letters (Requests For Information) for the design team.
Good to know: the review is focused on the drawings themselves β€” contradictions, single-sheet mistakes, buildability, and missing pieces (building-code checks are built in but turned off by default). Everyone shares one notebook, so each step builds on the last. If one page can't be read, the team keeps going and that page is flagged as a gap instead of stopping the whole review. Every finding links back to the sheet it came from.